Ambient That belong: How Stereotypical Cues Effect Gender Contribution for the Computer system Technology

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. Grams., and Steele, C. M. (2009). J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 97 (6), 1045–1060. doi:/a0016239

Sex Roles 82 (3-4), 127–141

Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A beneficial., Montoya, An excellent. K., and you can Jiang, L. (2017). Exactly why are Particular Stalk areas More Gender Well-balanced Than the others? Psychol. Bull. 143 (1), 1–thirty-five. doi:/bul0000052

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., and you may Hudson, L. (2013). The new Stereotypical Computers Scientist: Gendered mass media Representations as a boundary to Inclusion for women. doi:/s11199-013-0296-x

Sex Opportunities 69 (1-2), 58–71

Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, Elizabeth., and you will Lo, L. (2013). Manage gender-science Stereotypes Predict Technology Identity and you may Research Occupation Dreams One of Undergraduate Research Majors? Soc. Psychol. Educ. 16 (4), 541–554. doi:/s11218-013-9232-8

Destatis (2019). Studierende inside Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaft (MINT) und Technik-Fachern. Wiesbaden, Germany: Pupils in math, computer technology, research and you will techology (STEM) fields . Recovered off

Diekman, A beneficial. B., Steinberg, Meters., Brown, Elizabeth. Roentgen., Belanger, An excellent. L., and Clark, Age. K. (2017). A goal Congruity Brand of Part Entryway, Engagement, and you can Log off: Understanding Public Purpose Techniques inside the Stalk Gender Openings. Pers Soc. Psychol. Rev. 21 (2), 142–175. doi:868316642141

Eagly, An excellent. H., and you can Karau, S. J. (2002). Character Congruity Principle away from Prejudice toward Women Frontrunners. Psychol. Rev. 109 (3), 573–598. doi:-295x.109.step three.573

Eagly, An effective. H., and you will Wood, W. (2012). “Public Part Principle,” during the Handbook regarding Ideas out of Social Mindset, Frequency II. Writers P. van Lange, A great. Kruglanski, and you may E. Higgins (La, [Calif.]: SAGE ), 458–476. doi:446249222.n49

Eaton, Good. A., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, R. K., and you can West, K. (2020). Exactly how Gender and you may Battle Stereotypes Affect the Development of Students in the STEM: Professors’ Biased Analysis away from Physics and you can Biology Article-Doctoral People. doi:/s11199-019-01052-w

Else-Trip, N. M., Hyde, J. S., and you can Linn, Meters. C. (2010). Cross-federal Designs from Gender Variations in Math: Good Meta-Analysis. Psychol. Bull. 136 (1), 103–127. doi:/a0018053

Gender Equivalence Bureau Drawer Place of work (2017). Gender Equality White Paper (Sum Version. Tokyo, Japan: White report to the gender equivalence 2017 . Retrieved of

Gino, F., Wilmuth, C. A great., and you will Brooks, Good. W. (2015)pared so you’re able to Guys, Feminine Look at Professional Development since Equally Possible, however, Less Desirable. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. You S An effective. 112 (40), 12354–12359. doi:/pnas.1502567112

Grey, J. A great., and you will McN). Brand new Neuropsychology out-of Nervousness: An inquiry for the Features of your friend System. Oxford: Oxford College or university Press .

Greenwald, An excellent. G., McGhee, D. Elizabeth., and you can Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Computing Private Differences in Implicit Cognition: The new Implicit Relationship Test. J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464–1480. doi://0022-.6.1464

Gudykunst, W. B., and you can Lee, C. Meters. (2003). Determining the Authenticity of Thinking Construal Scales. Humm Res 31 (2), 253–274. doi:/j.1468-.tb00838.x

Heilman, M. Age., and you may Caleo, S. (2018)batting Gender Discrimination: A lack of Match Design. Classification Process. Intergroup Interactions 21 (5), 725–744. doi:430218761587

Ikkatai, Y., Inoue, A beneficial., Kano, K., Minamizaki, Good., McKay, E., and Yokoyama, H. Yards. (2019). Parental Egalitarian Thinking into Gender Positions Apply to Arrangement into Girls Getting Stalk areas within college in The japanese. Int. J. Sci. Edu. 41 (16), 2254–2270. doi:635

Ikkatai, Y., Minamizaki, single kvinner online dating A great., Kano, K., Inoue, An excellent., McKay, Age., and you may Yokoyama, H. M. (2020). Gender-biased Public Perception out of Base fields, Emphasizing the new Determine from Egalitarian Perceptions on Gender Opportunities. Jcom 19 (01), A08. doi:3/dos.19010208

Jasko, K., Pyrkosz?Pacyna, J., Czarnek, G., Dukala, K., and you will Szastok, M. (2020). The brand new Base Graduate: Just after Graduation, Visitors Already Disagree inside Employment Effects, Attributions for achievement, and you can Desired Occupations Features. J. Soc. Issues 76 (3), 512–542. doi:/josi.12392

Kemmelmeier, Meters. (2016). Social Differences in Questionnaire Responding: Affairs and you may Information about Study of Response Biases. Int. J. Psychol. 51 (6), 439–444. doi:/ijop.12386